Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp20161oay; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.84.193 with SMTP id b1mr3752144wiz.11.1337363745012; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5si12408459wee.1.2012.05.18.10.55.44; Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 4960A44700; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CA044700 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id ZiO1x8NxLp7y for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.mars-attacks.org (invaders.mars-attacks.org [88.191.83.84]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9D421D7 for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx1.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id AB7D2280874E; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200 From: nicolas vigier To: Romain d'Alverny Cc: board-private@ml.mageia.org Message-ID: <20120518175539.GT21938@mars-attacks.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org X-Sequence: 52 Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Fri, 18 May 2012, Romain d'Alverny wrote: > Hi everyone, > > so, Anne and me got in a conf call with JM Croset a few minutes ago to > get a status. > > He announced yesterday (Thursday, May 18) > http://blog.mandriva.com/en/2012/05/17/mandriva-linux-will-return-to-the-community/ > . So several discussions are popping up here and there. Mageia's > position has been transferred to some people inside Mandriva, among > which Peroyvind (see > https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?p=18041#p18041 - although > he doesn't have the full story it seems). > > He will announce early next Monday (22) that Mandriva SA will use > Mageia as a tech platform for its business server line, and contribute > back. Antoine Ginies (Mandriva engineer in chief for the business > server) will get in touch with us to see how we do this technically. > > He worries that trolls and discussions may damage Mageia in the coming > days (for both news: Mandriva using Mageia as a tech platform for its > Business Server line; and Mageia not following Mandriva in its > foundation things) because he realizes that... community stuff > sometimes goes out of hand; but he reassured us that, whatever is > said, he does mean good for everyone; so it's important to play it > cool and neutral on our side too. > > So, here's a suggested plan: > > * we announce/explicit both news on our side on Monday early morning > (CEST) as well, in a single blog post embedding all Mandriva-related > news: > - on one side, Mageia is not going to join Mandriva foundation > project (and why, cold reasons as we gave him), > - on the other side, Mandriva is going to use Mageia as tech > platform for its business server line (link) and contribute back. > - this double news should make it more obvious that things are not > so simple as "Mageia is dumping Mandriva" or "Mandriva is rebasing on > Mageia". > > * this news being published Monday morning, it leaves two full days > to propagate, before we push the Mageia 2 release news (Tuesday > evening) - interest about Mageia will have raised a bit in the > previous days, and this release news will hide partially the previous > news. > > * until now, all this has been kept private in board-private: a) > knowledge and decision about the foundation, and b) business server > thing. Note that about a), people may question both the decision and > the fact that it was private, without consulting the Council. We will > mail privately Council members to inform them about both a) and b), > but still. We won't need further arguments than what we explained to > Mandriva, and what the governance says. But still again. In the case > of things getting really ugly in the coming weeks, I'd suggest that we > call for a vote of confidence to make things very clear (from Council, > or from all registered contributors in LDAP). This looks like a good plan. I suggest starting the blog post on piratepad. Then sending a first draft of the blog post tomorrow (or when we have something ready) to council members to inform them about it and see what they think of it.